Нужен перевод The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.
This simple view of the matter suggests several important consequences. It proves incontestably, that the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it can never attack with success either of the other two; and that all possible care is requisite to enable it to defend itself against their attacks. It equally proves, that though individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter; I mean so long as the judiciary” Al. Hamilton, J. Madison, J. Jay, Federalist Paper #78 – The Judiciary will always be least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution.
Нужен перевод The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.
This simple view of the matter suggests several important consequences. It proves incontestably, that the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it can never attack with success either of the other two; and that all possible care is requisite to enable it to defend itself against their attacks. It equally proves, that though individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter; I mean so long as the judiciary” Al. Hamilton, J. Madison, J. Jay, Federalist Paper #78 – The Judiciary will always be least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution.
This simple view of the matter suggests several important consequences. It proves incontestably, that the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power; that it can never attack with success either of the other two; and that all possible care is requisite to enable it to defend itself against their attacks. It equally proves, that though individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter; I mean so long as the judiciary” Al. Hamilton, J. Madison, J. Jay, Federalist Paper #78 – The Judiciary will always be least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution.
Не можешь разобраться в этой теме?
Обратись за помощью к экспертам
Гарантированные бесплатные доработки
Быстрое выполнение от 2 часов
Проверка работы на плагиат
Интересные статьи из справочника
Поможем написать учебную работу
Отвечай на вопросы, зарабатывай баллы и трать их на призы.
Подробнее
Подробнее
Законодательная власть не только распоряжается казной, но и устанавливает правила, по которым должны регулироваться обязанности и права каждого гражданина. Судебная власть, напротив, не имеет влияния ни на меч, ни на казну; не имеет направления ни силы, ни богатства общества; и не может принимать активные решения. Ее можно поистине назвать не имеющей НИ СИЛЫ, НИ ВОЛИ, а лишь судом; и в конечном итоге должна зависеть от помощи исполнительной власти даже для эффективности своих решений.
Это простое представление о вопросе подразумевает несколько важных последствий. Оно бесспорно доказывает, что судебная власть намного слабее двух других ветвей власти; что она никогда не сможет успешно напасть на одну из них; и что для ее защиты от их нападок требуется все возможное внимание. Оно также доказывает, что хотя иногда отдельные случаи угнетения могут исходить от судов, общая свобода народа никогда не будет подвергаться опасности от этого направления; я имею в виду, насколько судебная власть будет менее опасна для политических прав Конституции.